razma766's Blog

Status quo thoughts on the status quo

Here is a letter I recently sent to the Midland Daily News:

In his recent letter, William Smith expresses his concerns with the status quo in the political process: “If the president and his party don’t help the majority of the people during his term in office, vote them out! Until then, how will we know? I am sick and tired of status quo. Can’t we just once pass some bills and see if they will help the American people? Maybe, just maybe, that in turn will help the condition of our country” (Sick of the status quo, February 15).

Although I sympathize with Williams frustrations, it is wishful thinking to expect anything other than the status quo from the American political process. Politicians, regardless of their party, face gross incentives in favor of pursuing their own reelection and virtually no incentives to improve the conditions of the public. As Don Boudreaux said in September of 2009: “No delusions should remain that the most recent presidential election has “transformed” Washington into anything grander than what it has always been: a ’spoils exchange’ where A and B shamelessly conspire to rob C and then swap the plundered proceeds with D for D’s commitment to help A and B retain their seats on this exchange.”

Kurt Bouwhuis

Print Comment Print Yahoo! Buzz Delicious Digg Facebook LinkedIn Mixx MySpace StumbleUpon Twitter

Equally Unequal

Here is a letter I recently sent to the Midland Daily News:

Dr. Valeriy Ginzburg states in a recent letter that “the bills adopted by the Senate and the House probably represent the most fair way of covering the uninsured while spreading the costs in an equitable fashion.” (“Health care reform imperative,” February 5).

I respectively disagree.

If the bills adopted by the Senate and the House truly spread costs across society fairly, the respective number of pages for these bills would not surpass 10 pages. In other words, it would be simple to total all health care costs and divide them equally amongst the members of society. It is precisely because these bills favor particular classes of people over others that these bills are well over 1000 pages of elusive legal jargon.

Kurt Bouwhuis

Print Comment Print Yahoo! Buzz Delicious Digg Facebook LinkedIn Mixx MySpace StumbleUpon Twitter

A Stimulating Broken Window Fallacy

http://tryingliberty.com/2010/01/28/stimulating-broken-window-fallacy/

Check out all the stimulating lessons from Obama's State of the Union

Print Comment Print Yahoo! Buzz Delicious Digg Facebook LinkedIn Mixx MySpace StumbleUpon Twitter

Birds still fly

Here is a letter I recently sent to the Midland Daily News:

In his recent letter, Scott Miller states, “it appears that some of our legislators are more concerned with profits for big business than the health and future welfare of their constituents.  Contact senators Stabenow and Levin and urge them to come together around a bipartisan effort to develop affordable clean energy and climate legislation…” (“Go Green,” Jan. 21).

In one breath, Scott acknowledges that politicians are concerned with pleasing special interests.  In his next breath, however, he urges his readers to contact the very class of people he decries in order to create a solution.

I’m puzzled.  Is Scott unaware that several large businesses are currently lobbying for clean energy legislation?  These large businesses will profit from new regulations that crush their smaller competitors.  Once clean energy legislation is passed into law, it would also not be surprising to find that these same large businesses are recipients of special government permits that exempt them from such regulations. 

I admire those who seek to reduce pollution.  I am saddened by those who are blind to the colossal gap between desired outcomes and the actual outcomes generated by government intervention.  Once this gap is recognized, it will become painfully obvious that desirable outcomes will not emerge from encouraging fellow citizens to jump into the slopping pit.

Kurt Bouwhuis

Print Comment Print Yahoo! Buzz Delicious Digg Facebook LinkedIn Mixx MySpace StumbleUpon Twitter

Google to end China censorship

Kurt Bouwhuis, Mackinac Center Intern

“Google Inc. will stop censoring its search results in China and may pull out of the country completely after discovering that computer hackers had tricked human-rights activists into exposing their e-mail accounts to outsiders.”

Read entire article hereMore information here

Hat tip to Eric Imhoff

Print Comment Print Yahoo! Buzz Delicious Digg Facebook LinkedIn Mixx MySpace StumbleUpon Twitter
« Older posts Newer posts »